Viewed in
2010
Premise
Part of ESPN's 30 for 30 series, a documentary about the 1995 Rugby World Cup.
Loved
Subplot of Justice Bekebeke.
Thoughts
Much more entertaining than Invictus.
This documentary was very educational, as it explained the history leading up to the World Cup, and the team's/country's nerve-wracking journey. There were a lot of strong, honest interviews, mainly from the rugby players.
I appreciated that the people (black and white) were not afraid to explain their hatred, fears, prejudices during these events. The subplot of activist, Justice Bekebeke, was fantastic. Bekebeke had so much anger and detested Mandela's decisions, that it made his testimonies funny and understandable.
This film and Invictus came out within six month of each other, told the same story, and Morgan Freeman had a hand in both. I cannot help but to compare the two. Far and above, The 16th Man was superior in educating and entertaining me. It was easier to sympathize and understand the emotions coming from these real-life characters.
The only thing I could take from Invictus was that I learned what "Madiba" meant. Interesting that in the documentary, a white rugby player used that term, and he used it endearingly, not pretentiously.
Clearly, I recommend watching this film instead of Invictus for those who want to learn about those amazing events.
What I would change
Nothing.
