Viewed in
1998, 2001
Formats
VHS, DVD
Premise
Stanley Kubrick's political satire about a war room of leaders and military try to defuse nuclear holocaust.
Thoughts
It's been a long time, but I recall this being my favorite Kubrick masterpiece. Before there was Eddie Murphy starting the one actor-multiple character gimmick, there was the late great Peter Sellers in his triple roles of hilarity. Personally, the performance I loved the most was the late great George C. Scott as a military general.
What I would change
Nothing.
Showing posts with label 1964. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1964. Show all posts
Fistfull of Dollars, A
Viewed in
2006
Premise
I don't remember, but it's Clint Eastwood's first big movie!
Who should watch
Clint Eastwood fans. Western fans.
Thoughts
This probably had a bigger impact when it first came out. I have seen too many iterations and parodies of the gritty Western to appreciate this movie.
Nevertheless, I recommend checking this out because of Mr. Eastwood's bad-ass-ness. Just seeing that stare makes me smile.
What I would change
Nothing.
2006
Premise
I don't remember, but it's Clint Eastwood's first big movie!
Who should watch
Clint Eastwood fans. Western fans.
Thoughts
This probably had a bigger impact when it first came out. I have seen too many iterations and parodies of the gritty Western to appreciate this movie.
Nevertheless, I recommend checking this out because of Mr. Eastwood's bad-ass-ness. Just seeing that stare makes me smile.
What I would change
Nothing.
Godzilla Vs. Mothra
Viewed in
1993
Formats
Syndicated TV (dubbed)
Premise
Godzilla and a giant moth fight!
Thoughts
Don't remember much, except for some decent fights, and annoying singing by the magical twins who somehow control Mothra.
What I would change
No idea.
1993
Formats
Syndicated TV (dubbed)
Premise
Godzilla and a giant moth fight!
Thoughts
Don't remember much, except for some decent fights, and annoying singing by the magical twins who somehow control Mothra.
What I would change
No idea.
Goldfinger
Viewed in
2000, 2010
Formats
DVD, HD TV
Premise
Sean Connery stars as 007 taking on Goldfinger, who plans to rob Fort Knox.
Liked
Sean Connery, Oddjob and Goldfinger characters.
Disliked
The outdated feel.
Thoughts
Not as cool as I recalled.
There's some really cool parts, such as Sean Connery being calm and cool under pressure, most of the time. I enjoyed the double entendre and funny one-liners. There's some memorable moments, such as Oddjob's hat, Pussy Galore's name, the Aston Martin, and Goldfinger attempting to laser off Bond's nuts.
What ruined it most for me was the snail-like pacing. For example, there was a lot of shots of someone driving towards their destination, then some more shots of driving, then some more. Obviously, this had a little to do with my modern film sensibilities, but it was more that I could stand. Compared to the Pierce Brosnan and Daniel Craig flicks that I'm more familiar with, Goldfinger's pace felt outdated in a bad way.
Another outdated aspect was the gadgets and special effects. This would not have felt as bad if the movie did not take itself seriously. I know in later Bond films, tongue-in-cheek and over-the-top were part of their appeal, but for this movie, I don't think it was intentional yet. Lastly, it probably had the greatest Bond theme song, had it not been for the fact that I loath Shirley Bassey's voice.
Arguably the best and most iconic of the Bond franchise to date, unfortunately, the test of time has not been kind to is re-watchability.
What I would change
Quicken the pacing in non-action scenes.
2000, 2010
Formats
DVD, HD TV
Premise
Sean Connery stars as 007 taking on Goldfinger, who plans to rob Fort Knox.
Liked
Sean Connery, Oddjob and Goldfinger characters.
Disliked
The outdated feel.
Thoughts
Not as cool as I recalled.
There's some really cool parts, such as Sean Connery being calm and cool under pressure, most of the time. I enjoyed the double entendre and funny one-liners. There's some memorable moments, such as Oddjob's hat, Pussy Galore's name, the Aston Martin, and Goldfinger attempting to laser off Bond's nuts.
What ruined it most for me was the snail-like pacing. For example, there was a lot of shots of someone driving towards their destination, then some more shots of driving, then some more. Obviously, this had a little to do with my modern film sensibilities, but it was more that I could stand. Compared to the Pierce Brosnan and Daniel Craig flicks that I'm more familiar with, Goldfinger's pace felt outdated in a bad way.
Another outdated aspect was the gadgets and special effects. This would not have felt as bad if the movie did not take itself seriously. I know in later Bond films, tongue-in-cheek and over-the-top were part of their appeal, but for this movie, I don't think it was intentional yet. Lastly, it probably had the greatest Bond theme song, had it not been for the fact that I loath Shirley Bassey's voice.
Arguably the best and most iconic of the Bond franchise to date, unfortunately, the test of time has not been kind to is re-watchability.
What I would change
Quicken the pacing in non-action scenes.
Mary Poppins
Viewed in
1996, 2007
Premise
Two kids, neglected by their money-driven father, meet a magical nanny.
Who should watch
Those who like weird, but family-friendly musicals. Julie Andrews fans.
Thoughts
Of all of Disney's animation films, this was arguable one of the best.
There was plenty of imaginative magic, silly comedy and catchy music to keep a child entertained. As an adult, I admired the quirky music and the visual technology. While not as pioneering as 'Who Framed Roger Rabbit', the combination of animation and live-action sequences was very good.
Julie Andrews was, a la Mary Poppins, 'practically perfect in every way'. Dick Van Dyke was a scene stealer as the Bert and the elder Mr. Dawes. His penguin dance scene was my favorite. The actress who played Jane was super cute. The only actor that bugged me was the one who played Michael, he never felt like a natural kid, which was weird, because he was a kid.
To me the weakest thing was the story, even for a kiddie musical. I can't put my finger on it why. There were scenes/songs that I wasn't sure if they were supposed to be funny, scary, sad, or moral. Also, what was the history behind Bert and Mary? Then again, as she once said 'I never explain anything'. You could blame it on my cynicism, but Bert's character bothered me, because in essence, he was a bum portrayed as a glorious lifestyle.
Despite some flaws, the film will always be a must-see for all movie watchers. You are never a kid or an adult until you have seen it.
What I would change
Not sure.
1996, 2007
Premise
Two kids, neglected by their money-driven father, meet a magical nanny.
Who should watch
Those who like weird, but family-friendly musicals. Julie Andrews fans.
Thoughts
Of all of Disney's animation films, this was arguable one of the best.
There was plenty of imaginative magic, silly comedy and catchy music to keep a child entertained. As an adult, I admired the quirky music and the visual technology. While not as pioneering as 'Who Framed Roger Rabbit', the combination of animation and live-action sequences was very good.
Julie Andrews was, a la Mary Poppins, 'practically perfect in every way'. Dick Van Dyke was a scene stealer as the Bert and the elder Mr. Dawes. His penguin dance scene was my favorite. The actress who played Jane was super cute. The only actor that bugged me was the one who played Michael, he never felt like a natural kid, which was weird, because he was a kid.
To me the weakest thing was the story, even for a kiddie musical. I can't put my finger on it why. There were scenes/songs that I wasn't sure if they were supposed to be funny, scary, sad, or moral. Also, what was the history behind Bert and Mary? Then again, as she once said 'I never explain anything'. You could blame it on my cynicism, but Bert's character bothered me, because in essence, he was a bum portrayed as a glorious lifestyle.
Despite some flaws, the film will always be a must-see for all movie watchers. You are never a kid or an adult until you have seen it.
What I would change
Not sure.
My Fair Lady
Viewed in
1997, 2000
Premise
Film adaptation of the musical.
Who should watch
Audrey Hepburn fans. Musical fans.
Thoughts
This was my favorite Audrey Hepburn film. I found her most charming and beautiful in here than in 'Breakfast at Tiffany's'. She also had an unrivaled chemistry with Rex Harrison. It was just a delight watching them go back and forth.
Aside from that, there was wonderful music, lavish sets and some hilarious comedy.
What I would change
Nothing.
1997, 2000
Premise
Film adaptation of the musical.
Who should watch
Audrey Hepburn fans. Musical fans.
Thoughts
This was my favorite Audrey Hepburn film. I found her most charming and beautiful in here than in 'Breakfast at Tiffany's'. She also had an unrivaled chemistry with Rex Harrison. It was just a delight watching them go back and forth.
Aside from that, there was wonderful music, lavish sets and some hilarious comedy.
What I would change
Nothing.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)